I write because I’m guilty.
Some may be deterred from reading onwards because they see
the ‘I’m’ and assume a certain kind of informality, perhaps a childishness.
Some may read on because they see ‘guilty’ and assume sex and drugs and late
nights of self-selling indulgence. Both are appropriate I feel.
And I feel through finding I write. It really is an
appropriate expression of what I happens; suddenly I will notice I have written
thousands of words, eaten into whole evenings with cold vegetables and aching
fingers – typing, typing, typing.
I think ‘finding yourself writing’ though, is extremely
difficult – almost like my indulgent kind of self-destruction. I hardly go
through the process of writing ideas on paper anymore; perhaps because I don’t think
I have any. Or perhaps because the physical manifestation on paper seems almost
sluggish. Instead, I feel awfully unworthy,
turning over, mulling through, picking at words and phrases like the ultimate
recycling. Everything I have read suddenly becomes a kind of carrion. In the
saturation of the media age I wonder how many people have what could be
considered ‘fresh words’ ‘fresh thoughts’. Often I marvel over Thomas Hardy and
how at the turn of the Twentieth Century, he not only expressed a kind of
lament but also coined a number of words. Perhaps worming a way into my language
of my own is the only way to retain any kind of value – like a parasite riving through
the rot.
However, the academically-esteemed method of value is often
through ‘further reading’. Could woman or man make a masterpiece if she/he had
the full ability of the English language yet had been raised on a diet of
shopping brochures , road signs and a dictionary? A difficult drag of the
tongue after life expressed in italics in the exp. Column: ‘ Question (noun.). The
young woman asked the doctor a question’.
What about myself –
a flurry of the Bronte’s, D.H Lawrence,
half-read texts, late nights pouring
over incredibly sensational paragraphs
but not knowing of the person who wrote
them. Does this make me a bad ‘reader’? Does it make me ‘bad’ that I never finished
Middlemarch but read the same paragraphs The Sea, The Sea three times over drinking coffee so acrid it made my
mouth twitch – like the formation of appropriate expression. When I sit and read
the guilt thickens over my fingers like a stain, telling me of waste, of waste.
For that is perhaps a rashness of statement which has rotted
down into uncertainty – is it better to consume
or produce? In reading the writing of others I may be moved internally. In
writing things own I am moved, even externally.
There is so much waste here – time on one side, paper, energy, life, on
the other. My guilt for this is all over everything, and I fight myself at night.
Will it make me a bad writer?’ I wonder if people would
rather be bad readers or bad writers. I guess that reading is typically an
expected skill, whereas writing seems to assume
some superiority – debatably. The debate is chaired, today, tomorrow,
day after bloody day, by guilt – the sharp wiry umpire-like figure who unfurls
through the corner of the gut.
Guilty because the time spent not writing could constitute
that of ‘wasted’. Guilty because the time in which I write is so often deemed
anti-social, ‘wasted’ in the words of my family. I wonder whether I write to
try and offer a way to understand or to
hide myself further. I cannot deal with questions and do not offer answers.
Do I talk about it to other people? If other people are
passionate about your passion they become competitive. If they are not, they
often regard it with a kind of hostility. We operate on an exchange of fears but perhaps this is too much. It is difficult to become attached to anything, in light of this fear. That is why I am so
attempted to detach – into tabloid television, even the safety of closing eyes
and curling up. It is non-destructive, but also ‘lazy’. See where language gets
me? Yet my hands still return to writing, like they are desperate to leave something
other than blood and bone.
Language gets me nowhere, except guilt. I want so often to
tell a person in the street that they are beautiful – beautiful has a meaning
for me and a wholly different meaning for them and I would be glad we shared
that realisation. That would mean something. Shared realisation rather than shared experience,
finally something fucking recognised. It would also mean, most probably, a series of
stares and be seen as unacceptable.
Still, My grandparents still attempt to search my face for
something they can acceptably ‘see’ –
for writing too is the persual of the
selfish, whereas as the social puppet seeing others is the ‘expected’. I am a brilliant liar. As part of that I am
learning to perfect that equilibrium of ‘being there’ for my family without
being wholly physically present, so giving ‘space’ too. It leaves bruises.
I break conventions through writing and writing breaks me.
Because there is a difference between writing and recycling.
A difference I have attempted through
breaking the skin, eating until I’m
sick, feeling the blood on the back of my head and feeling utterly empty. Then
writing. I write because I am terrified
that I will instead be misrepresented by my own fickle voice, that I will die
and will have only left money, belongings; nothing of difference. For I am guilty
of envying those visual artists –the opportunity
to express something which has never been seen before. Words are my lovers, but
also my fetter. It would be difficult to express if I love them, for haven’t
they already been lovers with everyone else, in some sense?
Instead I use them to turn flesh.
I write because I’m guilty.
No comments:
Post a Comment